CCI imposes penalty on seven entities for bid rigging in the tender of State Bank of India

0
220
Competition Commission of India -CCI
Competition Commission of India -CCI

The Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’) passed a final order against seven entities for indulging in anticompetitive agreement for supply of signages for branches/offices/ATMs of State Bank of India (SBI). Amongst these seven entities, one party was a lesser penalty applicant before CCI.

 

This matter was initiated suo motu by CCI on the basis of complaint received in 2018 alleging bid-rigging and cartelisation in the tender floated by SBI Infra Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The investigation inter alia found e-mails exchanged between the parties which formed the basis for manipulation of the bidding process.

 

Based on a cumulative assessment of the evidence collected, CCI found that there was an agreement amongst the parties which resulted in geographical market allocation as well as bid-rigging in the above mentioned tender of SBI. Accordingly, all the parties were held to be guilty of contravention of the provisions of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act), which prohibits anti-competitive agreements including cartels. Further, 9 (nine) individuals of these parties were also held liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective entities, in terms of the provisions of Section 48 of the Act.

Considering that one party has filed lesser penalty application besides cooperating during investigation as well as inquiry process and that most of the parties are MSMEs – some of which even acknowledged their conduct during the inquiry, CCI took a lenient view and decided to impose penalty upon the parties @ 1% of their respective average turnover. The individuals found guilty under Section 48 of the Act were also imposed penalty @1% of their respective average incomes. Further, considering the stage at which the lesser penalty applicant approached the CCI and in light of the co-operation extended by it thereafter, CCI granted a reduction in penalty by 90% to it and its individuals. Apart from the above, CCI also directed the parties and their respective officials to cease and desist from indulging in anti-competitive conduct.

 

A copy of the order in Suo Motu Case No. 02 of 2020 is available on CCI’s website at the following link:

 

https://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/SM-02-of-2020.pdf

Previous articleS S Nakul IAS appointed PS to Nirmala Sitharaman
Next articleIntegration of E-MANDIS into E-NAM Platform
Saurabh
Saurabh Sinha, Editor of IndianBureaucracy.com, is known for his credible, precise and insightful coverage of governance, civil services and administrative developments in India. Under his leadership, the portal has grown into a trusted national platform for accurate updates, appointments and policy movements within the bureaucratic ecosystem. Saurabh’s strong professional networking and deep understanding of government functioning enable him to present timely, reliable and well-contextualised information to readers across sectors. As a thought-driven editor, he promotes informed dialogue on governance reforms while maintaining high editorial standards. His calm, consistent and detail-oriented approach continues to strengthen the portal’s reputation. इंडियनब्यूरोक्रेसी.कॉम के संपादक सौरभ सिन्हा देश की नौकरशाही, शासन व्यवस्था और प्रशासनिक गतिविधियों की विश्वसनीय तथा संतुलित रिपोर्टिंग के लिए जाने जाते हैं। उनके नेतृत्व में यह पोर्टल नियुक्तियों, नीतिगत बदलावों और प्रशासनिक खबरों का एक भरोसेमंद राष्ट्रीय स्रोत बन चुका है। शासन तंत्र की गहरी समझ और मजबूत पेशेवर नेटवर्क के कारण सौरभ पाठकों को समयबद्ध, सटीक और संदर्भित जानकारी प्रदान करते हैं। एक विचारशील संपादक के रूप में वे सुशासन, पारदर्शिता और सुधारों पर सकारात्मक संवाद को बढ़ावा देते हैं। उनकी शांत, सूक्ष्म और पेशेवर संपादकीय शैली पोर्टल की प्रतिष्ठा को लगातार मजबूत कर रही है।