Physicists offer theories to explain mysterious collision at Large Hadron Collider

0
279
science indianbureaucracy
science indianbureaucracy

Summary:An unexpected bump in data from CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is causing physicists to theorize about what caused it — with potentially exciting results. Physicists are offering theories about what it could mean.

Physicists around the world were puzzled recently when an unusual bump appeared in the signal of the Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator, causing them to wonder if it was a new particle previously unknown, or perhaps even two new particles. The collision cannot be explained by the Standard Model, the theoretical foundation of particle physics.

Adam Martin, assistant professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame, said he and other theoretical physicists had heard about the results before they were released on Dec. 15, and groups began brainstorming, via Skype and other ways, about what the bump could mean if confirmed — a long shot, but an intriguing one. He and some collaborators from Cincinnati and New York submitted a pre-peer-review paper that appeared .

“It was so weird that people were forced to chuck their favorite theories and start from scratch,” Martin says. “That’s a fun area of particle physics. We’re looking into the unknown. Is it one new particle? Is it two new particles?”

The paper considers four possible explanations for the data, including the possibility that it could indicate a heavier version of the Higgs boson, also commonly known as “the God particle.” Further research could yield mundane explanations, Martin says, and the excitement could fade as it has many times in his career. Or it could open up new insights and call for new models.

“People are still cautiously optimistic,” he says. “Everybody knows that with more data, it could just go away. If it stays, it’s potentially really, really, really exciting.”

Authors of paper, “On the 750 GeV di-photon excess,” are Martin, Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Jamison Galloway, Stefania Gori, Alexander L. Kagan and Jure Zupan.

Source:University of Notre Dame

for more: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160108210123.htm.

Previous articleDevender Sikri becomes new Chairman of Competition Commission of India
Next articleArmy Day Seminar – Futuristic Capability Development & Indigenisation
Saurabh
Saurabh Sinha, Editor of IndianBureaucracy.com, is known for his credible, precise and insightful coverage of governance, civil services and administrative developments in India. Under his leadership, the portal has grown into a trusted national platform for accurate updates, appointments and policy movements within the bureaucratic ecosystem. Saurabh’s strong professional networking and deep understanding of government functioning enable him to present timely, reliable and well-contextualised information to readers across sectors. As a thought-driven editor, he promotes informed dialogue on governance reforms while maintaining high editorial standards. His calm, consistent and detail-oriented approach continues to strengthen the portal’s reputation. इंडियनब्यूरोक्रेसी.कॉम के संपादक सौरभ सिन्हा देश की नौकरशाही, शासन व्यवस्था और प्रशासनिक गतिविधियों की विश्वसनीय तथा संतुलित रिपोर्टिंग के लिए जाने जाते हैं। उनके नेतृत्व में यह पोर्टल नियुक्तियों, नीतिगत बदलावों और प्रशासनिक खबरों का एक भरोसेमंद राष्ट्रीय स्रोत बन चुका है। शासन तंत्र की गहरी समझ और मजबूत पेशेवर नेटवर्क के कारण सौरभ पाठकों को समयबद्ध, सटीक और संदर्भित जानकारी प्रदान करते हैं। एक विचारशील संपादक के रूप में वे सुशासन, पारदर्शिता और सुधारों पर सकारात्मक संवाद को बढ़ावा देते हैं। उनकी शांत, सूक्ष्म और पेशेवर संपादकीय शैली पोर्टल की प्रतिष्ठा को लगातार मजबूत कर रही है।